> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3251249&name=build.log
> .
>>> | *** unexpected failure for fed001(normal)
> Note the Fedora build is patched to use system libffi.
>>> Hmm. What happens if you don't patch it?
>> More hmmm: that makes the x86 unexpected errors go t
>> Should I try to send a patch for the remove all backward compatibility
>> thing? Or one for the specific #include problem I've been having?
>
> I've lost track of all the details here. But perhaps there's some
> historical cruft lying around because hsc2hs used to call GHC to compile its
> C f
Ian Lynagh:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:20:18PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>> Ian Lynagh:
>> You are right that the bindists use the default gcc (i.e., the one with the
>> LLVM backend). That is ok, though, as GHC supplies the stack unwinding
>> linker option.
>
> Do you really mean
On 07/08/2011 02:18, Evan Laforge wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
But I also think we may as well just remove most of these conditionals.
The GHC< 4.09 tests can surely be removed, and likewise the GHC< 6.3
tests. Personally I'd remove the GHC< 6.10 test too, but pe
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:20:18PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Ian Lynagh:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:57:40PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> >>
> >> The RC unfortunately doesn't build on Lion (OS X 10.7).
> >
> > I've put the latest 7.2 source here, along with OS X builds:
Ian Lynagh:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:57:40PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>>
>> The RC unfortunately doesn't build on Lion (OS X 10.7).
>
> I've put the latest 7.2 source here, along with OS X builds:
>http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.1-rc2/
>
> My guess is that the bindists w
