What sayeth ye all?
I approve of your suggestion. Well said!
3. I must admit I don't fully see how client code can be kept from the need
to enable the extension. In particular, if client code must use the explicit
opt-out, this is a rather obvious syntactic change - are you really
On 03/09/2011 02:05, Evan Laforge wrote:
Another way to do this would be to have GHC --make invoke itself to
compile each module separately. Actually I think I prefer this method,
although it might be a bit slower since each individual compilation has
to read lots of interface files. The main
Ah, but you're measuring the startup time of ghc --make, which is not the
same as the work that each individual ghc would do if ghc were invoked
separately on each module, for two reasons:
Excellent, sign me up for this plan then :) ghc on a single file is very
quick.
