Any chance #5421 (<> in withMVar (reproducible, but with large test
case) could be backported to 7.2.2?
-n
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be
> worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers
Hi Bit,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bit Connor wrote:
> Here's a bug I submitted 4 weeks ago, and there hasn't been much
> activity or responses regarding it since then:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5553
>
> It causes the error message:
>
>ghc_sendWakeup_bug: sendWakeu
Here's a bug I submitted 4 weeks ago, and there hasn't been much
activity or responses regarding it since then:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5553
It causes the error message:
ghc_sendWakeup_bug: sendWakeup: invalid argument (Bad file descriptor)
It would be great if someone co
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:28, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I've done a search/replace and called it RawFilePath. Ok?
Fantastic, thank you very much.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/list
On 10/11/2011 09:28, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
Is there any consensus about what to do here? My take is that we
should move back to lone surrogates. This:
1. Recovers the roundtrip property, which we appear to believe is essential
2. Removes all the weird problems I outlined earlier that can
On 09/11/2011 16:42, John Millikin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 08:04, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, I spent most of today adding ByteString alternatives for all of the
functions in System.Posix that use FilePath or environment strings. The
Haddocks for my augmented unix package are here:
http://c
On 9 November 2011 16:29, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Ok, so since we need something like
>
> makePrintable :: FilePath -> String
>
> arguably we might as well make that do the locale decoding. That's
> certainly a good point...
You could, but getArgs :: IO [String], not :: IO [FilePath]. And
locale-
On 10 November 2011 00:17, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:58:47PM +, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
>>
>> (Note that the above outlined problems are problems in the current
>> implementation too
>
> Then the proposal seems to me to be strictly better than the current
> system. Under bo
