*query*
Ah. So it does.
Thanks. I'll learn this language yet (^_~)
On 27/12/2011, Chris Dornan wrote:
> That’s as maybe but last time I looked (I don’t have it to hand) the OED
> generally accepts –ize or –ise spellings for British English (maybe even
> favouring the former).
>
> Chris
>
> From
That’s as maybe but last time I looked (I don’t have it to hand) the OED
generally accepts –ize or –ise spellings for British English (maybe even
favouring the former).
Chris
From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of David
My guess is that Americans were involved.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> Just of curiosity, why is it spelt with a z? Is it spelt thus in
> Scottish English? I thought that "generalised" is written throughout
> Great Britain.
>
> Cheers,
> MFD
>
> __
Hi,
full recompilation with ghc-7.4.1-rc1 is already triggered by a changed
"-o" option, which is inconvenient when creating different binaries with
shared modules. (see below)
It is no problem if I always omit the -o option and get binaries named
like my input file, though.
Can/should thi
The original goal was to come up with a simple solution. Perhaps that goal
is unattainable, or at least attaining it has much higher cost than we had
hoped. If that is the case we must take a step back and look at changing
how things are done currently. Perhaps the approach that a record label
beco
