On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:55:05PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> Dear GHC team,
>
> The archive
> http://botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/ghcBugs/ghc741candQuest.zip
>
> contains the source of the docon-2.12 application.
> ghc-7.0.1 compiles it and runs the test successfully.
> ghc-7
On 30/12/2011, Andriy Polischuk wrote:
> You're right, i should have written "ambiguities" instead.
> That was not joke, just i somehow didn't notice Chris Smith answer.
Hm. I though at first that if backslash were the selection operator,
then there must be programs of unclear semantics, but actu
You're right, i should have written "ambiguities" instead.
That was not joke, just i somehow didn't notice Chris Smith answer.
However, I think, there are some drawbacks in using dot for that in
comparison with qualified imports access. The latter is easier to
distinguish from composition by eye,
Certainly not no conflicts: lambda expressions.
On 30/12/2011, Colin Adams wrote:
> On 30 December 2011 15:55, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>
>> On 30/12/2011, Andriy Polischuk wrote:
>> > Yet another idea:
>> > Consider using '\' as record access operator. No conflicts with anything
>> at
>> >
Hello Serge,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:55:05PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> ...
> Has the status of the module Random changed in ghc-7.4.1 ?
Between ghc-7.0.4 and ghc-7.4.1, we find
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.2.1/html/users_guide/release-7-2-1.html
that says:
1.5.12.22. ran
On 30/12/2011, Andriy Polischuk wrote:
> Yet another idea:
> Consider using '\' as record access operator. No conflicts with anything at
> all, and,
> moreover, it really looks like hierarchical access. Reminds of filesystems
> though.
I hope this is a joke.
>
> Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote
>>
>> A
Dear GHC team,
The archive
http://botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/ghcBugs/ghc741candQuest.zip
contains the source of the docon-2.12 application.
ghc-7.0.1 compiles it and runs the test successfully.
ghc-7.4.0.20111219 cannot compile it.
1. It requires to add Show a to Integral a in a
Dear GHC team,
for your convenience, I have filed individual bugs about the build
errors:
Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 14:54 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> the build system seems to be quite confused on arch/os-combinations
> besides {i386,amd64}/linux. All these worked fine with 7.2.2:
>
> ht
