On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 01:22:31AM -0500, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> > It seems to me that there's only one essential missing language feature,
> > which is appropriately-kinded type-level strings
>
> Isn't this possible now with type → kind promotion?
Unfortunately, I believe promotion of buil
> It seems to me that there's only one essential missing language feature,
> which is appropriately-kinded type-level strings
Isn't this possible now with type → kind promotion?
> Cheers,
> Gershom
Cheers, (and Happy New Year),
MFD
___
Glasgow-haskell
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 15:46, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> Its installation requires Cabal:
> > which cabal
> cabal: Command not found.
> >
> And Cabal is difficult to install, it reports that such and such package
> versions are missing.
> On the other hand, Cabal is, probably, present insid
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:43:26PM +0200, Yitzchak Gale wrote:
> Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> > I have ghc-7.4.0.20111219 made from source and tested it on the
> > DoCon-2.12 application -- thanks to people for their help!
> > It looks all right.
> > This was -- with skipping the module Random
>
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> I have ghc-7.4.0.20111219 made from source and tested it on the
> DoCon-2.12 application -- thanks to people for their help!
> It looks all right.
> This was -- with skipping the module Random
> Now it remains to add the Random package.
> I have taken AC-Random Vers
Gershom Bazerman wrote:
> Beyond that, it would really help namespacing in general to appropriately
> extend the module system to allow multiple modules to be declared within a
> single file -- or, better yet, "submodules". I know that this introduces a
> few corner cases that need to be thought th
People,
I have ghc-7.4.0.20111219 made from source and tested it on the
DoCon-2.12 application -- thanks to people for their help!
It looks all right.
This was -- with skipping the module Random.
Now it remains to add the Random package.
I have taken AC-Random Version 0.1 from hackage.
Its
On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> The trouble is that I just don't have the bandwidth (or, if I'm honest, the
> motivation) to drive this through to a conclusion. And if no one else does
> either, perhaps it isn't *that* important to anyone. That said, it clearly
> is *so
Frege has a detailed explanation of the semantics of its record implementation,
and the language is *very* similar to Haskell. Lets just start by using Frege's
document as the proposal. We can start a new wiki page as discussions are
needed.
If it's a serious proposal, it needs a page to specif
Dear GHC team,
I tried to fix these problems myself, and three of the bugs had more or
less trivial solutions (that hopefully are right):
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5733
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5735
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5734
However, this
10 matches
Mail list logo