On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:46, Evan Laforge wrote:
>>
>> Is there something that changed in 7.4.1 that would cause it to decide
>> to interpret .hs files instead of loading their .o files? E.g.:
>
>
> I thought this was deliberate becaus
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:46, Evan Laforge wrote:
> Is there something that changed in 7.4.1 that would cause it to decide
> to interpret .hs files instead of loading their .o files? E.g.:
>
I thought this was deliberate because the debugger won't work with object
files?
--
brandon s allbery
Is there something that changed in 7.4.1 that would cause it to decide
to interpret .hs files instead of loading their .o files? E.g.:
% ghc -c T.hs
% ghci
GHCi, version 7.4.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
Loading package integer-gmp ...
>>>Hi, I'd like to propose an extremely simple extension to ghc's record
>>>disambiguation rules,
>> I wonder if John is teasing us? Nothing wrt to records is simple (IMHO).
> That is rather defeatist. Degree of simplicity is actually something that
> very
> quickly becomes very relevant and a
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:21 PM, AntC wrote:
>>Hi, I'd like to propose an extremely simple extension to ghc's record
>>disambiguation rules,
> I wonder if John is teasing us? Nothing wrt to records is simple (IMHO).
That is rather defeatist. Degree of simplicity is actually something that very
qu
>Hi, I'd like to propose an extremely simple extension to ghc's record
>disambiguation rules,
I wonder if John is teasing us? Nothing wrt to records is simple (IMHO).
John seems to be unaware of the threads on 'Records in Haskell' (ghc-users)
or 'Type-Directed Name Resolution' (cafe) that have
