Hi all,
In preparation for students working on concurrent data structures GSOC(s),
I wanted to make sure they could count on CAS for array elements as well as
IORefs. The following patch represents my first attempt:
https://github.com/rrnewton/ghc/commit/18ed460be111b47a759486677960093d71eef386
Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> Appoligies if you are already familair with these items.
I wasn't, until today. Thanks for all these tips! They're all going
to be mightily useful.
> PS: That looks like a pretty sweet box you've got going there. :)
It is pretty muscular, yeah. :)
--
"the lyf so
On March 28, 2012 12:40:02 Sajith T S wrote:
> Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> > Intel is more recent to this game. I believe AMD's last non-NUMA
> > machines where the Athalon XP series and Intel's the Core 2 series.
> >
> > An easy way to see what you've got is to see what 'numactl --hardware'
> > sa
Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> Intel is more recent to this game. I believe AMD's last non-NUMA machines
> where the Athalon XP series and Intel's the Core 2 series.
>
> An easy way to see what you've got is to see what 'numactl --hardware' says.
Ah, thanks. I trust this one qualifies?
$ numactl
On March 28, 2012 04:41:16 Simon Marlow wrote:
> Sure. Do you have a NUMA machine to test on?
My understanding is non-NUMA machines went away when the AMD and Intel moved
away from frontside buses (FSB) and integrated the memory controllers on die.
Intel is more recent to this game. I believe
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Sure. Do you have a NUMA machine to test on?
Yes. There's a machine at school with 32 CPUs on four NUMA nodes.
--
"the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne."
-- Chaucer.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
On 27/03/2012 01:14, Sajith T S wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the reply. It seems that forwarding the message here was a
very good idea!
Simon Marlow wrote:
-- From a very recent discussion on parallel-haskell [4], we learn
that RTS' NUMA support could be improved. The hypothesis is t
