ghc-7.4.2 should also build fine on Fedora 17 ARM.
Just "yum install ghc llvm" first.
I can provide a src rpm if it helps.
Jens
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-has
Hello,
I am late to the discussion and this is not entirely on topic, for which I
apologize, but I like the multi-branch case syntax someone mentioned
earlier:
Writing:
> case
> | p1 -> e1
> | p2 -> e2
> | ...
desugars to:
> case () of
> _ | p1 -> e2
> | p2 -> e2
> | ...
-Iavor
On 11.07.2012 20:05, Tyson Whitehead wrote:
On July 11, 2012 04:51:50 Christian Maeder wrote:
Is it not enough to store floats into memory just before equality tests
(or add rounding in the instance definitions of Float and Double in Eq
and Ord)?
You have to be 100% consistent in how you do ev
On July 11, 2012 04:51:50 Christian Maeder wrote:
> Is it not enough to store floats into memory just before equality tests
> (or add rounding in the instance definitions of Float and Double in Eq
> and Ord)?
You have to be 100% consistent in how you do every operations in all cases
otherwise dif
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:50 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 10/07/2012 23:03, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I sent this mail to Haskell Cafe earlier today, and was pointed [1] at
> > this list. As such...
> >
> > Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated!
>
> It looks like you're maki
On 11/07/2012 09:51, Christian Maeder wrote:
Am 11.07.2012 10:25, schrieb Simon Marlow:
On 11/07/2012 08:36, Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
I think this bug is serious and should be turned into a ticket on
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/
Would you do so Sönke?
The abstraction of floats (Flo
Am 11.07.2012 10:25, schrieb Simon Marlow:
On 11/07/2012 08:36, Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
I think this bug is serious and should be turned into a ticket on
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/
Would you do so Sönke?
The abstraction of floats (Float or Double) is broken if equality
considers
On 10/07/2012 23:03, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
All,
I sent this mail to Haskell Cafe earlier today, and was pointed [1] at
this list. As such...
Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated!
It looks like you're making a ForeignPtr from the Addr# or Ptr that
points to the contents of the ByteAr
On 11/07/2012 08:36, Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
I think this bug is serious and should be turned into a ticket on
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/
Would you do so Sönke?
The abstraction of floats (Float or Double) is broken if equality
considers (random and invisible) excess bits that are
Hi,
I think this bug is serious and should be turned into a ticket on
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/
Would you do so Sönke?
The abstraction of floats (Float or Double) is broken if equality
considers (random and invisible) excess bits that are not part of the
ordinary sign, exponent an
10 matches
Mail list logo