> >I guess both items could be improved upon by extending GHCi to provide
> >an additional `:def` facility tailored to Haskell symbols allowing to
> >pass more meta-information (such as package and module information) into
> >the resulting command string... would something like that have any
> >cha
On 04/08/2012 08:33, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Simon Hengel writes:
[...]
I have the following in my .ghci:
-- hoogle integration
:def hoogle \q -> return $ ":! hoogle --color=true --count=15 \"" ++ q ++
"\""
:def doc\q -> return $ ":! hoogle --color=true --info
On 03/08/2012 10:29, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi Simon,
Am Freitag, den 03.08.2012, 09:28 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow:
My question is: Has anybody worked in that direction? And are there any
fundamental problems with the current RTS implementation and such
closures?
Long ago GHC used to have an
