On 21 August 2012 07:36, John Lato wrote:
>> From: Brandon Allbery
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Carter Schonwald <
>> carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> meaning: flags for treating it as a warning vs as an error? (pardon, i'm
>>> over thinking ambiguity in phrasing).
>>> if that
> From: Brandon Allbery
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Carter Schonwald <
> carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> meaning: flags for treating it as a warning vs as an error? (pardon, i'm
>> over thinking ambiguity in phrasing).
>> if thats the desired difference, that sounds good to me!
>
On 17/08/2012 11:18, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | Would it be reasonable to change ghc's behavior to treat this
> | (ie an 'import' statement that hides something that isn't exported) as a
> | warning instead of an error?
>
> Yes, that would be easy if it's what everyone wants. Any other opinion
I'll *try* :)
I assume ghc rc, plus having cabal installed
1) cabal unpack the most recent haskeline, and fix it so it can build,
this is updating the Setup.hs file for haskeline, as
theres no longer a Control.Exception.Extensible (instead its just
Control.Exception.Base ), so that just needs t
On 17/08/2012 17:08, Wolfram Kahl wrote:
During one of my long Agda runs (with GHC-7.4.2), I observed the following
output, with run-time options
+RTS -S -H11G -M11G -K256M
:
7694558208 30623864 3833166176 0.11 0.11 234.75 234.7900 (Gen: 0)
7678904688 29295168 3847737784 0
That does seem odd. Can you give instructions for how to reproduce this? The
fewer dependencies the better :-)
Simon
From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Carter Schonwald
Sent: 17 August 2012 19:01
To: GHC Users List
S
