You can avoid the error by replacing
eval :: Exp - (-) Memory Integer
with
eval :: Exp - Memory - Integer
which should be the same, but apparently isn't internally in GHC. This is
definitely a bug.
Sjoerd
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:55 AM, José Romildo Malaquias j.romi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:46:28PM +0100, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
You can avoid the error by replacing
eval :: Exp - (-) Memory Integer
with
eval :: Exp - Memory - Integer
which should be the same, but apparently isn't internally in GHC. This is
definitely a bug.
As I want the
Thanks. Certainly a bug. I've created a ticket
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7372.
Turns out that it's fixed in HEAD already, and I *think* the fix is in
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7312, which should get into 7.6.2.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From:
Hi Kazu,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:37:32PM +0900, Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
I seems to us (my friends and me) that term rewriting rules for
ByteString are not fired in recent GHCs.
Thanks for the report. I've filed a ticket here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7374
Thanks
Ian
Hi Apostolos,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:07:56AM -0400, asyropou...@aol.com wrote:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.4.1/html/building/sec-porting-ghc.html#sec-booting-from-hc
Some community members have made Solaris binary distributions in the
past. It would be easier to start from one of
Herbert Valerio Riedel h...@gnu.org writes:
Hello GHC HQ,
I've been trying to improve/fix a minor optimization sub-optimality
w.r.t to the following code (code like that results from the
generics-based NFData deriver[1]):
[...]
jfyi, this has been migrated to
