It hasn't made it to the standard yet, though. If some experimental
feature is implemented in GHC, it doesn't mean it's set in stone.
I find this discussion useful — there are some interesting points
(splitting "case of" into two parts) that I don't remember reading in the
original thread (but may
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> I find this discussion useful — there are some interesting points
> (splitting "case of" into two parts) that I don't remember reading in the
> original thread (but maybe it's just me).
>
Mentioned twice that I recall, as treating 'of' as
