I think we already mostly have this. The separation (remembering
something I read off Trac I think,) was something like:
* cvs-ghc mailing list: Prospective patches, automatically generated
build/commit emails, etc.
* glasgow-haskell-users mailing list: Developers and users of GHC
discussing iss
Carter Schonwald wrote:
> hey all,
> It seems to me (and i've certainly heard other people echo this sentiment)
> that: ghc dev chatting gets buried in the huge volume of commit + build
> report emails, and that creates (perhaps) another barrier to involvement in
> ghc dev at the hobbyist (rather
hey all,
It seems to me (and i've certainly heard other people echo this sentiment)
that: ghc dev chatting gets buried in the huge volume of commit + build
report emails, and that creates (perhaps) another barrier to involvement in
ghc dev at the hobbyist (rather than part time/full time ) scale?
Hi,
I'm currently trying to implement word2Double#. Other such primops
support both x87 and sse floating point math. Do we still support x87
fp math? Which compiler flag enables it?
-- Johan
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@
Hi!
I'm trying to implement word2Double# and I've looked at how e.g. LLVM
does it. LLVM outputs quite clever branchless code that uses two
predefined constants in the .data section. Is it possible to add
contents to the current .data section from a function in the NatM
monad e.g.
coerceWord2F
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Terei wrote:
> I have always considered the LLVM code generator my responsibility and
> will continue to do so. I don't seem to find the time to make
> improvements to it but make sure to keep it bug free and working with
> the latest LLVM releases. So if oth
I have always considered the LLVM code generator my responsibility and
will continue to do so. I don't seem to find the time to make
improvements to it but make sure to keep it bug free and working with
the latest LLVM releases. So if others want are interested in working
on it then there is plenty
Friends
You'll have seen Simon Marlow's recent announcement (included below):
| Today I'm announcing that I'm leaving Microsoft Research.
Simon Marlow and I have worked together on GHC for nearly two decades.
During much of that time we have shared a cup of coffee every morning
(one cup each, si
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> I'm curious how much of the "compile twice" situation for static and
> dynamic libraries could actually be shared.
Probably none; on most platforms you're actually generating different code
(dynamic libraries require generation of position-i
