(Sorry, forgot to CC the list)
Original Message
From: Thijs Alkemade m...@thijsalkema.de
Sent: Thu Jan 03 10:31:50 CET 2013
To: rocon...@theorem.ca
Subject: Re: Error building ghc on raspberry pi.
rocon...@theorem.ca wrote:
Some further information it seems that llc is
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:27:15PM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I made a second mistake. I meant (LinSolvRing (UPol k)). Apologies.
| I don't know why 7.4 accepts it, but I'm not inclined to investigate...
| looks like a bug in 7.4.
|
| ghc-7.4.1 may use a special trick, but is
worked for me under x86 SunOS 5.10
Cheers Christian
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013,
09:52:19 Uhr CET
3402 total tests, which gave rise to
13556 test cases, of which
10 caused framework failures
10486 were skipped
2954 expected passes
OK I have tested with today's GHC 7.6.2, which is very slightly later than the
release candidate.
When I add (EuclideanRing (UPol k)) to the signature for cubicExt, the whole of
demotest compiles. So that works.
Your misconception is here:
| c) Pol3_ has
|instance (LinSolvRing (Pol a),
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
When matching instances, GHC does not take account of the context of
the instance. Say you have
data T a = ...
data S1 = ...
data S2 = ...
[a] instance Num a = Num (T a) where ...
This is copying to the list my reply to Simon:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 12:57:02PM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
OK I have tested with today's GHC 7.6.2, which is very slightly later
than the release candidate.
When I add (EuclideanRing (UPol k)) to the signature for cubicExt, the
whole
rocon...@theorem.ca writes:
Some further information it seems that llc is segfaulting:
Where did you get your LLVM build from? Did you try running the LLVM
testsuite? IIRC, LLVM 3.0 was less than stellar on ARM.
- Ben
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
Yes, please do add a flag to suppress this duplicate constraints warning,
e.g., -fno-warn-duplicate-constraints.
Thanks! -- Conal
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
Hmm. Actually there isn’t a flag to suppress it, I’m afraid. Would you
like me
Oh! I see it's already done. Thanks much!
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
Yes, please do add a flag to suppress this duplicate constraints warning,
e.g., -fno-warn-duplicate-constraints.
Thanks! -- Conal
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Simon
