I think this can definitely be clarified. I'll update the docs a
little later today when I get a chance.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> Is this something that could be clarified in GHC's documentation? Patch?
>
> Simon
>
> | -Original Message-
> | From: gh
Iavor, yes! Please do so. If there's fallout we can look at it as it comes.
If you don't mind, please squash the commits in your branch together
into one and 'drop it' on the master branch. This is normally the way
most of us drop features, and I think it makes it easier to notice and
look at when
Hello,
I think that the simple type nats solver (branch type-nats-simple) is
pretty much ready for merging with HEAD. Should I go ahead and merge it in?
-Iavor
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Austin Seipp wrote:
> I think this can definitely be clarified. I'll update the docs a
> little lat
Is this something that could be clarified in GHC's documentation? Patch?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Kazu
| Yamamoto
| Sent: 12 September 2013 04:43
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org; ghc-d...@haskell.org
| Su
