Hello,
My input is this: I think a lot of confusion stems from some
documentation that just needs to be cleared up.
I think that just cleaning up the pages so that:
* http://www.haskell.org/cabal has binaries for Tier 1 platforms: OS
X, Windows, FreeBSD i386/amd64, Linux i386/amd64. IMO, there
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Tim Watson wrote:
> In Erlang, I can rpc/send *any* term and evaluate it on another node. That
> includes functions of course. Whether or not we want to be quite that
> general is another matter, but that is the comparison I've been making.
>
Note that Erlang gets
On 25 Jan 2014, at 18:12, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> 1) you should (once 7.8 is out) evaluate how far you can push your ideas wrt
> dynamic loading as a user land library.
> If you can't make it work as a library and can demonstrate why (or how even
> though it works its not quite satisfactory),
Awesome! I'll be spinning this up soon.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Luke Iannini wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Happy to report that I've finished an approach to armv7/armv7s fat
> compilation, just in time for 7.8's imminent release.
>
> You'll find the necessary scripts here:
> https://github.com
cabal-install doesn't even have to be distributed in one tar.gz with
GHC, just merely mentioning cabal-install binaries on
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download will surely help (assuming we get
to actually have the cabal-install binaries :)
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Gábor Lehel wrote:
> +1
Hi folks,
Happy to report that I've finished an approach to armv7/armv7s fat
compilation, just in time for 7.8's imminent release.
You'll find the necessary scripts here:
https://github.com/ghc-ios/ghc-ios-scripts
and the latest instructions for building GHC for iOS usage here:
https://ghc.haske
