On 2014-02-03 at 23:35:14 +0100, Austin Seipp wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.8.1:
[...]
> Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
> before the release!
Please note that GHC 7.8.1RC1 is also available for Travis-CI as part
Just to note a problem I encountered on Windows, which may well be user
error.
I unpacked the mingw tarball and added the bin directory from it to my
path. cabal install then failed with "cabal.exe: does not exist" after
producing some other output.
Running with -v3 suggested that the actual prob
Hi Joachim,
> Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 19:49 +0900 schrieb Jens Petersen:
> > Hi, I did a test build [1] of the current ghc-7.8 branch for Fedora 21
> > devel, which I think should also install to Fedora 20.
>
> I’m surprised that it worked for you. Did not you not hit
> http://ghc.haskell.org/
wrt existing issues, is there a list of these so we can avoid reporting
them?
Thanks
George
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Austin Seipp wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.8.1:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.8.1-rc1/
> http://www.haskell.o
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.8.1:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.8.1-rc1/
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.8.1-rc1/html/
This includes the source tarball and bindists for Windows, Linux, OS
X, FreeBSD, and Solaris, on x86 and x86_64. There is a sign
Dear Jens,
Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 19:49 +0900 schrieb Jens Petersen:
> Hi, I did a test build [1] of the current ghc-7.8 branch for Fedora 21
> devel,
> which I think should also install to Fedora 20.
I’m surprised that it worked for you. Did not you not hit
http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/
Hi, I did a test build [1] of the current ghc-7.8 branch for Fedora 21
devel,
which I think should also install to Fedora 20.
I put the packages for x86_64, i386 and armv7hl into the yum repos under
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/petersen/ghc-7.7/
I haven't tested this latest build yet but w