> > On 26/04/16 09:20, AntC wrote:
> > There's an intriguing comment here wrt anonymous records: ...
>
> I'm afraid the sentence on the wiki page is slightly misleading, ...
> with the change to functional dependencies,
> the overlapping instances solution works rather nicely,
> in that it works
Hi AntC,
On 26/04/16 09:20, AntC wrote:
> There's an intriguing comment here wrt anonymous records:
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records/OverloadedRecordFields/
> MagicClasses#Designextension:anonymousrecords
> (End of the section)
>
> "... this doesn't quite work, because the two inst
There's an intriguing comment here wrt anonymous records:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records/OverloadedRecordFields/
MagicClasses#Designextension:anonymousrecords
(End of the section)
"... this doesn't quite work, because the two instances overlap,
but it is possible with a bit more tr