On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:05 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote:
Whoa, whoa. Your reply is making a number of presuppositions, and putting
words in my mouth I did not say.
Firstly: I am totally in favour of a typed intermediate language. Then the
question is what type-theory do we use within the IR?
I'd far rather see GHC's implementation of FunDeps made more coherent (and
learning from Hugs) than squeezing it into the straitjacket of System FC and
thereby lose expressivity.
To call System FC a straitjacket is to suggest that there is a straightforward
alternative that would serve the
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:36:42 AM Tom Schrijvers wrote:
> Maybe our Haskell'17 paper about Elaboration on Functional Dependencies sheds
some more light on your problem:
Thanks Tom, I've also been working through the 2011 expanded version of 'System
F with Type Equality Coercions' that Adam
