Re: Unpack primitive types by default in data

with ~, do we have data Foo = Foo ~Int | Bar ~Double Alex On 17/02/2012, at 11:59, Johan Tibell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Mason wrote: >> Sounds like it's definitely worth playing with. I would hesitate to use the >> shootout benchmarks though, simply bec

Re: Unpack primitive types by default in data

Hi Johan, Sounds like it's definitely worth playing with. I would hesitate to use the shootout benchmarks though, simply because anything there is already going to be unpacked to the hilt. How difficult do you think it would be to implement this in GHC? Cheers, Alex On 17/02/2012, at 11:25,

Alex Mason wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn

LinkedIn I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Alex Mason Alex Mason Computer Science Tutor at Australian National University Canberra Area, Australia Confirm that you know Alex Mason https://www.linkedin.com/e/3s7ug4-gjv7nt1u-3a/isd/22814

What would be required to make a LLVM backend for GHC

if we can let them know what we need, hopefully they can help make life easier for us. Thanks, Alex Mason ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users