Re: Haskell on Red Hat Enterprise...

2005-03-17 Thread Andy Moran
strings. Have we converged on a long-term solution for this problem? Is hscpp ready for the job? Cheers, Andy -- Andy Moran Ph. (503) 626 6616, x113 Galois Connections Inc. Fax. (503) 350 0833 12725 SW Millikan Way, Suite #290

Re: cpphs (was Re: Haskell on Red Hat Enterprise...)

2005-03-17 Thread Andy Moran
that was built using cpphs, if the GHC binary were used solely within an organization (i.e. not distributed)? What if cpphs were distributed with such a GHC binary as an executable? A -- Andy Moran Ph. (503) 626 6616, x113 Galois Connections Inc

Re: cpphs (was Re: Haskell on Red Hat Enterprise...)

2005-03-17 Thread Andy Moran
Andy Moran wrote: I notice that cpphs understands CPP stringification (if invoked with --hashes). Most of the gcc 3.4 failures (in fact, all of that I've seen) have to do with fooling -traditional into turning macro constants into Haskell strings, which can more readily be done

Re: cpphs (was Re: Haskell on Red Hat Enterprise...)

2005-03-17 Thread Andy Moran
Malcolm Wallace wrote: Andy Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I notice that cpphs understands CPP stringification (if invoked with --hashes). Most of the gcc 3.4 failures (in fact, all of that I've seen) have to do with fooling -traditional into turning macro constants into Haskell strings, which

Re: @-bindings broken in 6.0?

2003-06-18 Thread Andy Moran
parsing easier too). I haven't played with Template Haskell at all, so I don't know if '[|' is already a distinguished token. Cheers, Andy -- Andy Moran Ph. (503) 526 3472 Galois Connections Inc. Fax. (503) 350 0833