On 27/08/2020 02.56, Bertram Felgenhauer via Glasgow-haskell-users wrote:
> David Feuer wrote:
>> I'm looking to play around with an array-based structure with
>> sub-linear worst-case bounds. Array is pretty awkward in that context
>> because creating a new one takes O(n) time to initialize it. Is
On 10/08/2020 23.22, Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 03:12, Bardur Arantsson <mailto:s...@scientician.net>> wrote:
>
> Once you have that bit set up, you can copy *most* of the libraries
> ..so's you're using to that folder on th
On 09/08/2020 14.50, Volker Wysk wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know of the command line argument "-static". But this only affects
> the Haskell libraries. I want to link some programs completely
> statically, no external libraries needed.
>
> When just linking with "-static" I still have those dynamically
On 07/09/2016 09:09 AM, C Maeder wrote:
> The asymmetry that you mention is already apparent for (Haskell98) infix
> expressions, i.e. when "composing" lambda- or if-expression:
>
> (if c then f else g) . \ x -> h x
>
> Parentheses around the last argument of "." do not matter, but
> parentheses
On 07/04/2016 12:31 PM, Akio Takano wrote:
> Hi glasgow-haskell-users,
>
> I have written a wiki page about a proposed extension called
> ArgumentDo. It's a small syntactic extension that allows "do"
> expressions, lambdas and a few other kinds of expressions to be used
> as function arguments, wi
On 05/06/2016 11:04 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a bit of rather tedious and frustrating debugging I came to the
> realisation that the code for the `-hb` profiling option is not thread
> safe. See https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12019
>
> This gives us an opportunit
On 09/30/2015 08:10 PM, David Feuer wrote:
> The Eq constraint is needed to support pattern matching, the raison d’être
> of pattern synonyms. I'm pretty sure the reason you need
> ScopedTypeVariables for your second example is that GHC only allows pattern
> signatures with that extension enabled.
On 2014-11-13 15:25, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Hello Austin,
>
> Friday, November 7, 2014, 9:16:22 PM, you wrote:
>
>> For one, Microsoft doesn't support XP anymore, so most people are
>> moving off it anyway. 'Soon' even XP Embedded will be obsoleted.
>
> at the end of http://freearc.org/Sta
On 2014-05-30 11:00, John Meacham wrote:
> JHC has the feature that
>
> Graphics.UI.GTK.Button can live in any of:
>
> Graphics/UI/GTK/Button.hs
> Graphics/UI/GTK.Button.hs
> Graphics/UI.GTK.Button.hs
> Graphics.UI.GTK.Button.hs
>
> It lets you have deep module hiarchies without deep directory
>
On 2014-04-25 15:17, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I want to propose a simple change to the -i flag for finding source
> files. The problem we often have is that when you're writing code for a
> library that lives deep in the module hierarchy, you end up needing a
> deep directory structure, e.g.
>
-1,
On 2014-04-25 15:17, Simon Marlow wrote:
[--snip--]
-1
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
On 2014-04-25 18:52, Edward Kmett wrote:
> I check out and work on projects on a bunch of machines, so it is important
> that I
> can just pull with git and go. AFAIK, git doesn't understand them won't build
> symlinks
> for me, so it'd just become another setup step for very marginal benefit, an
On 2013-10-02 20:13, Reid Barton wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Edward Kmett wrote:
>
>> That is admittedly a pretty convincing example that we may want to provide
>> either a LANGUAGE pragma or a different syntax to opt in.
>>
>
> I suppose the Applicative desugaring can reliably be d
On 02/12/2013 09:37 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 11/02/13 23:03, Johan Tibell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> Of course we do also make well-intentioned changes to libraries, via the
> library proposal process, and some of these break APIs. But it wouldn't
> do any harm to batch these up and defer them until t
On 09/04/2012 12:56 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> Hello Haskellers,
>
> I've been wondering whether it might be useful to add a feature to
> Haddock similar to what can be found in other API documentation systems,
> specifically an optional parseable "since"-attribute, declaring the last
> p
On 07/10/2012 12:51 PM, malcolm.wallace wrote:
> Also, it is more likely to be a buggy instance of Eq, than a real loss
> of referential transparency.
>
Speaking of which... would it be remiss of me to mention the elephant in
the room, namely the Eq instance for Float?
AFAICT there is no possibl
On 07/09/2012 06:01 PM, Mikhail Vorozhtsov wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 09:52 PM, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
>> On 09/07/12 14:44, Simon Marlow wrote:
>>> I now think '\' is too quiet to introduce a new layout context. The
>>> pressing
>>> need is really for a combination of '\' and 'case', that is
>>> s
On 04/19/2012 12:45 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Hello GHC Devs,
>
But I'm missing a similar facility for constraining the
space-dimension. In some other languages such as C, I have (more or
less) the ability to check for /local/ out-of-memory conditions (e.g. by
checking the return value
18 matches
Mail list logo
