Re: Can't compile GHC

2005-05-09 Thread Bennett Todd
2005-05-09T16:09:16 Daniel Carrera: > I think it should be if you want Haskell to grow in acceptance. > The first barrier that new potential users hit is the one that > causes most people to give up and move on to a different project. > That first barrier should be made as low as possible. This is

Re: trying to install unregistered build on linux w/ uClibc

2004-06-18 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-18T15:59:21 Simon Marlow: > > tar xjf ghc-6.2.1-src.tar.bz2 > > tar xzf ghc-6.2.1-i386-unknown-linux-hc.tar.gz > > cd ghc-6.2.1 > > ./configure --enable-hc-boot --enable-hc-boot-unregisterised > > --prefix=/usr ./distrib/hc-build --enable-hc-boot-unregisterised > > -

trying to install unregistered build on linux w/ uClibc

2004-06-18 Thread Bennett Todd
Alas, still no joy. This sequence: tar xjf ghc-6.2.1-src.tar.bz2 tar xzf ghc-6.2.1-i386-unknown-linux-hc.tar.gz cd ghc-6.2.1 ./configure --enable-hc-boot --enable-hc-boot-unregisterised --prefix=/usr ./distrib/hc-build --enable-hc-boot-unregisterised --prefix=/usr make Pro

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-18 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-18T13:39:38 Donald Bruce Stewart: > Yes. Download and build the src, and 'make install' :-) Thanks --- turns out my problem was that something in my env breaks the makefile, Simon gave me what I hope is the voodoo to get it to work. -Bennett pgpNBMx3rmHsm.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-18 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-18T08:57:27 Simon Marlow: > Ok, $(ProjectsThatExist) is supposed to be set to all the projects in > your source tree that can be built, which on a normal GHC build should > be something like this: > > ProjectsThatExist="glafp-utils ghc libraries hslibs" > > This value is set right near th

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-18 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-18T01:57:14 Donald Bruce Stewart: > That's interesting. GHC unregisterised on amd64/openbsd *does* pass all > the testsuite tests. Which brings us around to the question that opened this thread, is there any way to install the unregistered build? Thanks, -Bennett pgpxPpD8HzWZd.pgp Desc

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-17 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-17T09:04:40 Simon Marlow: > Hmmm. Try these please: > > make show VALUE=ProjectsToBuild > make show VALUE=ProjectsThatExist > make show VALUE=SUBDIRS bash-2.05b$ make show VALUE=ProjectsToBuild ProjectsToBuild="" bash-2.05b$ make show VALUE=ProjectsThatExist ProjectsThatExist="

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-16 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-16T13:26:45 Simon Marlow: > Bennett, who said he had a working unregisterised build. I'm by no means a Haskell expert, or even a Haskell programmer; but my unregistered build does do hello.hs successfully. -Bennett pgp9V3uOTefQY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-16 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-16T10:33:49 Simon Marlow: > On 15 June 2004 16:24, Bennett Todd wrote: > > 2004-06-15T14:52:53 Simon Marlow: > >> After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree, > >> somewhere else. Then 'cd' into this tree, and issue the > &

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-15 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-15T14:52:53 Simon Marlow: > After hc-build, you should unpack a completely fresh GHC source tree, > somewhere else. Then 'cd' into this tree, and issue the configure/make > commands. Alas, no joy; again, "make" does nothing. These Makefiles are cleverer than I am, I can't quite figure ou

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-15 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-15T14:52:53 Simon Marlow: > On 15 June 2004 14:18, Bennett Todd wrote: > > ./distrib/hc-build ... > > ./configure --with-ghc=`pwd`/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace > > make > > > > That last make didn't do anything. > > After hc-build, you shou

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-15 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-14T16:06:05 Simon Marlow: > You probably don't want to install the registerised build; just use it > to build a fresh tree: > > $ ./configure > --with-ghc=/unregisterised-build/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace > $ make Everything was fine up to there, but "make" does nothing at all. I follow

Re: Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-14 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-14T16:06:05 Simon Marlow: > You probably don't want to install the registerised build; just use it > to build a fresh tree: > > $ ./configure > --with-ghc=/unregisterised-build/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace > $ make Thanks, I'll give it another go. It'll be a few days before I can get back

Re: Glasgow Haskell on different versions of Linux

2004-06-08 Thread Bennett Todd
2004-06-08T14:17:22 Christian Maeder: > since version 6.2 we have 2 binary distributions for (generic) > linux: for glibc 2.2 and glibc 2.3 If it were possible to construct and ship a statically-linked ghc, that might be ideal; it should be portable across a wide range of Linuxes, regardless of wh

Unregistered build (was Re: AMD64)

2004-06-02 Thread Bennett Todd
I too would be happy with an unregistered build. I've tried off and on to port ghc to my linux distro (uses static linking against uClibc, glibc isn't present at all). Every time I go through the process, I get stuck at the point where I seem to have a working unregistered build. I can't quite fin