Hello Johan,
I did the initial implementation of GHC.Eventlog. Sadly, I haven't
had time to work on it since starting a full-time job after
university. That being said, I am still interested in GHC and the
improvement of GHC.Eventlog. Hopefully soon, I will have the time to
do more development
Hello Felipe,
I copied this email to Sean Lee & Manuel M T Chakravarty as they
worked on Haskell+CUDA, maybe they can comment on the current status?
Here's their paper...
GPU Kernels as Data-Parallel Array Computations in Haskell
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/papers/gpugen.pdf
Hope that helps
Hope that helps...
--
Donnie Jones
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, John Van Enk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This may be more appropriate for a different list, but I'm having a hard
> time figuring out whether or not we're getting a cross compiler in 6.12 or
> not. Can some one point me t
Hello Dan,
Best place to ask is glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org since that is
the GHC users list.
I have CC'd your email to the GHC user list.
Cheers.
--
Donnie Jones
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this is the right place to ask.
> GHC 6
quot;Other"
section to be called "Details" since this section describes in detail
the software necessary for building GHC.
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Prerequisites
Hope this helps other users in the future.
--
Donnie Jones
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Sim
Hello Colin,
In my working with GHC, I have found this page very helpful since it
succinctly outlines the steps for Rebuilding GHC and ensuring you are
up-to-date with everything GHC needs:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Rebuilding
Best of luck!
--
Donnie Jones
On Mon, Mar
compile-time (static)
flags.
Hope that helps.
--
Donnie Jones
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Colin Paul Adams
wrote:
> I have added a subdirectory named verify to the compiler directory,
> and made a change to simplCore to call functions from it.
>
> I have managed to get it to compil
Hello Simon,
I agree that this page has a major overlap. I myself added additional
libraries recently (time and parallel packages to libraries for GHC RTS
parallel profiling testing), and it would have been helpful to have the
information from AddingLibsToBuild page. At first, I assumed that add
ich is far
more common, stable, robust, and definitely taught/used in many university
projects. (Some of these reasons may be the same reasons GHC repo is
switching to git.)
As I said, I am new to hacking on GHC, so I am not sure what reasons there
are to switch to Cabal for the bui
