specify such a requirement, while violating it emits an
> | error.
>
> What does it mean to say "the compiler unrolls it to a loop". If GHC sees
> a tail recursive function, it certainly compiles it to a loop! (But that's
> not called "unrolling".)
>
Hi Simon,
thanks for the answer! I see why inlining is not a good idea, but why is it
not unfolded. I mean we don't need any true recursion if the function is
tail-recursive or am I mistaken?
However my point was more on a semantic point of view: If I write a function
in a recursive way, but ac
> (drop (index+len) haystack, index + len)
Nothing -> ([],0)
Regards!
Georg
--
Georg Martius, Tel: +49 177 6413311 -
--- http://www.flexman.homeip.net --
pgpBBQgLBloc8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Spam detection software, running on the system "h7568.serverkompetenz.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of
Spam detection software, running on the system "h7568.serverkompetenz.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of
xcWakeUpIdle is defined in libwxc-gtk2.5.2-0.9.so.
Karl M. Syring
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
--
Georg Martius, Tel: (+49 34297) 89434
w it works fine with ghc 6.2 and 6.4.
The patches are attached.
Cheers,
Georg
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:04:13 -, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17 February 2005 16:25, Georg Martius wrote:
Another bug in ghc!
/usr/bin/ghc -M wxcore/src/Graphics/UI/WXCore/WxcClassTypes.hs \
-iou
anyway? It would make obsolete so many problems
IMO.
Cheers,
Georg
--
Georg Martius, Tel: (+49 34297) 89434
--- http://www.flexman.homeip.net -
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell
ohi dir/filename.hi is not
reflected in the dependencies.
I tried:
ghc -M -odir out -ohi out/A.hi A.hs
but nothing changed.
Simon??
Thanks again for your bug fixing,
-- Daan.
--
Georg Martius, Tel: (+49 34297) 89434
--- http://www.flexman.homeip.net -
makefile.lib.dif
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:48:11 +0100, Daan Leijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Georg Martius wrote:
Hi,
Patrick and I found some answers to the questions/problems we encountered.
Finally got the thing to work. (patches appended)
Great!
I have a possible fix:
add -odir out/... to the call of
How can ghc forget the compiled stuff?
The objects are definitely there, so there is no need to recompile WX.o,
...
@Daan: I tried to delete the dependency wx from the install rule of the
makefile but that
doesn't matter. I would like to install it by myself to see if the lib is
working. Do
| otherwise = return (())
Ideas?
Again, many thanks,
-- Bill Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
--
Georg Mart
s complexity is
exponential in its arg.
I'm using GHC 6.0.1 under Mandrake 9.1 on a 1.8 GHz Pentium box with 256MB RAM.
Any idea where I'm going wrong?
-- Bill Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Georg Martius, Tel: (+49 34297) 89434
--- http://www.flexman.homeip.net -
_
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:33:25 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to those who responded to this thread about 'deriving'. My current
thoughts are:
* I'd be happy to add the ability to separate a 'deriving' clause
from its data type declaration, if we can agree syntax
14 matches
Mail list logo
