is this something else?
P.S. infix type synonyms seems to work well so far!
Johan Glimming.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Hi
I got ghc-6.5 prerelease from the CVS and managed to get it up and
running, *except* for ghci, the interactive part.
Is there something in particular that I need to think about to make
ghci support get compiled into ghc?
Johan Glimming
te address
<>
make[2]: *** [GHC/Float.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make: *** [build] Error 1
Johan Glimming.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo
resolve this.
Cheers,
Simon
On 19 February 2005 13:06, Johan Glimming wrote:
Simon,
It did not even work with make (no concurrency) on the Mac OS X 10.3.4
platform with fink installed. Output from the compilation process:
../../ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace -optc-O -optc-Wall -optc-W
-optc
ser, and would not affect much else in ghc?
Johan Glimming.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
o use type synonyms for instead of data type definitions,
to save on all the constructor names hanging around.
Johan Glimming.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
ical syntax is the same as
that for data constructors" [someone had read this somewhere].
Best Wishes,
Johan Glimming
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users