nstall the workaround for ghc-pkg is to add the option
> > "-f $HOME/.cabal/store/ghc-9.2.1/package.db" to the end of the command
> > "ghc-pkg list". For compilation the workaround is to add "-package-db
> > $HOME/.cabal/store/ghc-9.2.1/packa
Hi George,
Since many versions of cabal, `install` only installs executables, not
libraries, so if that worked for you, you must have had an old version
of cabal.
Please see https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/6481 for some
context and to help you find a new workflow that works for you
(ideal
Hi Thomas,
> The changelog (and the 3.6 branch) does not include
> https://github.com/haskell/cabal/pull/7493. This is just as well since HEAD
> (with this merge) doesn't fix the related issue in my testing, but I'm
> curious if such a fix can be part of a point release or if it must be 3.8?
You may also be interested in the "Hackage Matrix CI" links
on Hackage pages and the non-maintainer updates
of packages performed as part of the service to the community.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Sébastien Hinderer
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am part of the OCaml development team. As you ma
OK. In that case, let's remember to get *that* version of cabal into 7.8.4.
/me conditions himself with chocolate to help the remembering
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Thomas Tuegel wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Mikolaj Konarski
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Carter Schonwald
wrote:
> Thomas and I have found some bugs in HPC on OSX, and we're in the midst of
> tracking those down,
You mean these are regressions? If they are introduced
in one of the non-blocker fixes in 7.8.4, we can probably
just revert them. Anyway, t
(cross-com^H^H^Hposting to glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org)
Well, sorf-of. A few extra unobvious parameters and workarounds
are required in each case, but it's doable, (arguably) simpler
than real cross-compilation and already exhibits problems
that real cross-compilation may in some circumstanc
