Are there any plans to release an OS X Intel version of this ?If
not, has anyone has any success in getting the PowerPC version to run
under Rosetta (complains about invalid intel instructions) ?-- Forwarded message --From: Simon Marlow <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Apr 19, 2006 1:52 AM
Are there any plans to release an OS X Intel version of this ?If not, has anyone has any success in getting the PowerPC version to run under Rosetta (complains about invalid intel instructions) ?
On 4/19/06, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Me too.
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I for one would love to see support for my macbook soone than 6.6
-reilly hayes
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/lis
Great news ! Any word on the Windows binary ?
Simon Marlow wrote:
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.4.1
=
The GHC Team is pleased to announce
exactly those problems are?
It would be a pity if some of them ended up not being addressed
due to them not being generally known about.
thx
--sigbjorn
- Original Message - From: David Nick Main
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Sent: Monday, June 27
I'd like to second this - the Win32 problems in
6.4 are preventing several projects from moving forward.
John Meacham wrote:
Any word on 6.4.1? The major FFI bug in 6.4 is holding back some
projects of mine.
John
___
Glasgow-haskel
uggestions are appreciated.
--Nick Main
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
You should compile the .c file using GHC itself. This guarantees that,
under the hood, you are using the right version of gcc.
I've never been able to get MS VC++ to work for compiling statically
linked C source - but it works great for building DLLs that you can then
reference from the Haskel
