On 07/07/2012, Jonas Almström Duregård wrote:
> Couldn't we use \\ for multi-case lambdas with layout?
>
> If not, these are my preferences in order (all are single argument
> versions):
> 1: Omission: "case of". There seems to be some support for this but it
> was not included in the summary.
> 2
On 05/07/2012, Mikhail Vorozhtsov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After 21 months of occasional arguing the lambda-case proposal(s) is in
> danger of being buried under its own trac ticket comments. We need fresh
> blood to finally reach an agreement on the syntax. Read the wiki
> page[1], take a look at the tic
ed:
> e{ x = True }
> {* `e` is some arbitrary expression, possibly denoting a record type;
>`x` one of those names for which you've solved the namespace problem
> *}
Ah, sorry; I added this to the wiki.
Cheers,
strake
___
Gl
