Hello Serge,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:55:05PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> ...
> Has the status of the module Random changed in ghc-7.4.1 ?
Between ghc-7.0.4 and ghc-7.4.1, we find
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.2.1/html/users_guide/release-7-2-1.html
that says:
1.5.12.22. ran
Hello Serge,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:03:45PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> ...
> This leads to
>
> DExport.hs:28:8:
> Could not find module `System.Random'
System.Random can be found in http://hackage.haskell.org/package/random.
Best regards
Thorkil
> ...
_
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:44:43PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
> ...
> I initially
> tried to use the CPP ## string concatenation operator to create unique
> names (tedious, but works) but GHC runs CPP in traditional mode so
> that doesn't work.
One -traditional way that I have used to conc
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
> ...
> Are there better workarounds?
I am not sure about that, I assume that you have looked at
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4068?
> ...
Best regards
Thorkil
___
Hello,
Yet another data point would be my current use of Haskell in various integer
factorization activities where I would consider the performance, even for
relatively large integers (say, 100-1000 decimal digits) very important.
However, I wouldn't complain if some simple and manageable imple
Hello,
On Thursday 19 March 2009 18:03, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Thorkil Naur wrote:
> ...
> > 1. An important property of such installers is that you are told, right
from
> > the start, that all the information you are present
Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:03, Thomas Schilling wrote:
> There should be a file called testlog somewhere, either at the
> toplevel or within the tests directory. Could you search for
> "apirecomp001" and send me the test output from running that test. I
> can't reproduce t
Hello,
On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:51, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 6.10.2:
> ...
> Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
> before the release!
> ...
I have tried the Intel Mac installer and the source packag
Hello,
On Monday 24 November 2008 23:48, Barney Stratford wrote:
> > The heading seems to be: Your build is missing it's required GMP (GNU
> > Multiple Precision) library
> No, I have GMP installed, and it's correctly compiling against it. The
> issue isn't that these symbols are missing altogethe
Hello,
On Monday 24 November 2008 23:15, Barney Stratford wrote:
> There's good news and bad news. The good news is that the compilation of
> my shiny almost-new GHC is complete. The bad news is, it won't link.
> It's grumbling about
>
> ld:
> /System/Fink/src/fink.build/ghc-6.8.2-1/ghc-6.8.2/rt
Hello Greg,
On Friday 21 November 2008 15:56, Gregory Wright wrote:
> ...
> ppc/
> Leopard still
> fails, but I now have an account on a machine that I can use to test
> and debug.
And if you need such an access (now or in the future), please just say the
word and you can get access to my PP
Hello,
On Sunday 28 September 2008 19:27, humasect wrote:
> Ah, indeed it does! Then, more about GHC API:
> "Shell: Shell: missing -B option"
>
> I can't find any information of what this -B is, it is not in GHC sources or
> anything helpful from google.
The -B is used from a ghc shell script to
Hello,
On Monday 08 September 2008 14:22, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Dear BDS hackers
>
> We'd like GHC to be buildable on BSD, but at the moment it isn't. We
support GHC on Linux, Windows, Mac, but we really need help with BSD.
I would like to do something about this. I have (a number of) x8
Hello,
On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:57, Christian Maeder wrote:
> I understand that gmp is needed for the certain libraries like the
> Prelude with Double and Integer.
>
> But I do not understand why gmp is so deeply buried in the rts.
> Are the basic types Int and Pointer not enough to write a
Hello,
On Thursday 17 January 2008 05:24, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Thorkil Naur:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tuesday 08 January 2008 15:07, Christian Maeder wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've succeeded in building a binary distribution
Hello,
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 22:05, Judah Jacobson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have managed to build ghc using the initial release of the editline
package:
>
> Hackage link:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/editline-0.1
> Haddock: http://code.haskell.org/editline/di
Hello,
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 15:07, Christian Maeder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've succeeded in building a binary distribution that uses static
> libraries for gmp and readline. libreadline.a, libncurses.a and libgmp.a
> with corresponding header files are included. (For license issues ask
> someone
Hello,
On Friday 04 January 2008 12:03, Christian Maeder wrote:
> ...
Thanks a lot for this response.
> I'm not happy about this framework hick-hack either.
I am glad we agree about that.
> I've only pushed
> it, because we needed a readline solution on macs.
I understand that there are prob
Hello,
On Thursday 20 December 2007 20:15, Jerry Charumilind wrote:
> ...
> Besides getting a working compiler, my other goal is to get contribute
> a working build process on Leopard back to MacPorts, since they
> continue to have no solution right now
(http://trac.macports.org/projects/macp
Hello,
First of all: Welcome to the club. I hope you will find it enjoyable. And then
to your questions:
I have never tried to bootstrap GHC from C, so I am not really able to help
with your specific problem. However, if you just want a running GHC, the
binary distributions should provide an e
Hello,
The GHC User's Guide, Versio 6.6.1
(http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/options-optimise.html)
says:
-O currently also implies -fvia-C.
I seem to remember some communication a while back that seemed to imply that
this is no longer the case. So my question is: Is t
Hello,
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 16:41, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce the Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.6.1.
> ...
A few comments to the source bundles
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.6.20070410-src.tar.bz2
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-
Hello,
I'm afraid that this is outside my direct experience. However, looking at
http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2006/Oct/msg00578.html
that google was kind enough to find for me, some assembler code generation
error seems indicated. I can see that you use -O2, but not whether -f
Hello,
A long shot, but perhaps worth looking into: The reaction that you report here
seems similar to the one reported in trac #1195 Build error on MacOSX (Intel)
10.4.8 for HEAD from 2007-03-05 when compiling with ghc-6.6:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1195
That ticket report
Hello,
The GHC repository ghc/utils/ext-core contains a parser and an (incomplete?)
interpreter, apparently for some earlier version of GHC core.
Best regards
Thorkil
On Thursday 08 March 2007 15:58, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to parse GHC Core to an abstract syntax tree, as th
Hello,
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 16:15, Ariel Apostoli wrote:
> but when I try installing ghc from that page it seems to install fine
> but when I invoke /usr/local/bin/ghc i get:
>
> dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libreadline.5.1.dylib
> Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/ghc-6.6/ghc
Hello,
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 16:30, Peter Tanski wrote:
> ...
> Thorkil Naur and others have suggested writing the whole
> thing as small assembler operations and piece them together in
> Haskell; I have been looking into that as well but it seems to entail
> inlinin
Hello,
I get a similar reaction starting ghci built from a ghc-HEAD pulled
2007-Jan-12 on a PPC Mac OS X 10.4.
Best regards
Thorkil
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 03:03, David Kirkman wrote:
>
> I just built ghc from HEAD on OS X (ppc), and get the following error
> when starting ghci:
>
> ---star
Hello,
Sometimes, ghc complains about '#' for me when the C preprocessor has not been
run and there is an unexpected #include or #define in the way. Also, as I
read
ifeq "$(ghc_ge_603)" "YES"
# These modules are provided in GHC 6.3+
EXCLUDED_SRCS += \
System/Directory/Internals.hs
...
e
seems difficult to embrace.
> This is the problem I face: GHC unfortunately does not use Integer as
> a mathematical operation but as a primitive type, complete with
> bitwise operations.
I do not understand what problem you are referring to here.
> ...
> On Aug 24, 2006
Hello,
Not much help, I'm afraid, but for what it's worth: I have built GHC-6.6 and
some HEAD-ish version successfully on a PowerBook G4 with Mac OS X 10.3
(Panther?) and also after upgrading to 10.4 Tiger. I have never tried with
10.2. To assist in your difficult decisions, here are some detai
Hello,
It appears that you already got an answer to your question that I hope you can
use. So just for completeness: On my PPC Mac OS X 10.4, both ghc-6.4.1 and
ghc-6.6 produce results similar to the one you report for OSX. And on my Suse
Linux, both ghc-6.4.1 and ghc-6.6 produce results ("wron
Hello,
I am not an expert on sockets, but I have both a Linux installation and a PPC
Mac OS X 10.4 with both ghc-6.4.1 and ghc-6.6. So if you allow me some
additional details (such as complete program texts), perhaps I can perform
some useful experiments under your conductance.
Best regards
Th
Hello,
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 11:34, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Thorkil Naur wrote:
> > ... I have
> > produced an experimental darcs patch that solves some problems, while
> > possibly introducing others:
> >
http://thorkilnaur.dk/~tn/GHC/testsuite/patch/barto
Hello,
This is an attempt to address (a very small part of) this: On my PowerPC Mac
OS X 10.3 (Panther, I think, not Tiger as I have written elsewhere), I have
built the ghc-6.6 branch (of about 2006-Nov-07 19.00 UTC) using
GHC-6.4.1.pkg.zip (The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, ver
Hello,
Let me make that offer, then, that I would like to help investigate and fix
GHC on MacOS. The obstacles that I have mentioned earlier are ones that I
would eventually have removed in any case, so don't worry, I will not be
wasting any time.
Regards Thorkil
On Monday 02 October 2006 09:
Hello,
Nobody seems to have reacted on this. I own a Mac that I don't use
particularly much. It seems within reach that I could use it to assist you
with both of your questions. As a side effect of having great fun myself, of
course.
There are several obstacles that need to be removed, however
Hello Peter,
Sorry for the late reply. From your latest communication which seems to be
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:12:05 -0400
From: Peter Tanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL License (was Replacement for GMP: Update)
To: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am a bit uncertain where the
Hello,
On Thursday 10 August 2006 07:31, Peter Tanski wrote:
...
> Summary: I finally settled on modifying OpenSSL, since that would be
...
Being a heavy user of Haskell Integers, I have followed this development with
great interest. Although your decision has its drawbacks, it could very well
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 01:35, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> primitives work with just the same internal structures. i thinl that
> only real advantage of adding primop instead of adding FFI import is
> that PrimOps.cmm contains already implemented wrappers for calling GMP
> functions while for FFI y
On Monday 27 March 2006 16:33, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Thorkil, i can't understand why you can't just use FFI to import
> functions you required? why you need to patch the PrimOps list?
Hello,
As I wrote earlier, using FFI is also a candidate for getting access to
additional GMP functions. Howev
On Monday 27 March 2006 12:57, Simon Marlow wrote:
> quotInteger2Expzh_fast is the function you are adding to PrimOps.cmm to
> implement the primop. The patch in your original message indicated that
> you had added a stub for this function, so it should link ok. I don't
> understand what has g
copied to make GHC.Prim.hi
but I have not been able to find anything that relates to this.
So I am again at a loss, aksing for help to proceed.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best regards
Thorkil Naur
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
kell/work> ghc --version
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tn/tmp/Haskell/work>
Best regards
Thorkil Naur
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
44 matches
Mail list logo
