Hi Simon!
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:20:40AM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> There are several things that aren't research issues: notably, faster
> copying, fewer intermediate lists, fewer state-monad-induced
> intermediate closures. These are things that would move sharply up our
> priority
MR K P SCHUPKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was thinking about improving array performance, and was wondering
> if a transactional model would work well.
>
> I would be interested in any comments... I suspect somebody has done this
> before, but I havent looked for any papers yet.
O'Neill and
I was thinking about improving array performance, and was wondering
if a transactional model would work well. You would keep a base copy
of the array, and any writes would be written to a delta style transaction
list. A reference to the array would be the list plus the base array.
Different refere
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [Haskell] performance tuning Data.FiniteMap
|
| Is fixing GHC arrays a big research job or is it
| something that someone can straightforwardly
| handle if my site actually gets enough traffic to
| warrant it?
|
| -Alex-
|
| On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Simon Peyton-J
