Re: -K in 6.12.2

2010-04-23 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
I am sorry, please withdraw my last letter (about -M, -K): > For the test compiled under -O, 2300k in "./Main +RTS -K2300k -RTS" > is the minimal memory option of this kind for the test to finish without > break. > [..] I have confused "-M..

-K in 6.12.2

2010-04-22 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
he test to finish without break. In 6.12.2, 90k is sufficient, maybe, GHC ignores this "-K", -"M" ... Could you explain, please? Regards, - Serge Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mail

-K switch

2005-02-02 Thread Santoemma Enrico
Hello, I'm getting this error: Stack space overflow: current size 1048576 bytes. Use `+RTS -Ksize' to increase it. The application is compiled under ghc 6.2.1 I've increased it and everything works, but before I begin to look for the way to pass an environment variable to a cgi app on apache und

RE: -K

2004-10-11 Thread Simon Marlow
On 11 October 2004 05:37, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote: > I am not sure but have such an impression that the -K option > (for the stack size) appears and disappears between the GHC > versions. Nope, the -K option has always been there. > ghc-6.2.2-September-26 requires

-K

2004-10-10 Thread Serge D. Mechveliani
Dear GHC developers, I am not sure but have such an impression that the -K option (for the stack size) appears and disappears between the GHC versions. ghc-6.2.2-September-26 requires -K to be set independently of -M (when the stack is exhausted). Is not this more nice and flexible to take

+RTS -K in ghc-4

1998-10-20 Thread S.D.Mechveliani
Running the programs compiled with ghc-4 (several examples), i have noticed that it pretends to spend thousands of space less than ghc-3.02. Typically, ghc-3.02 with +RTS -H100k -K9k runs as fast as ghc-4with +RTS-K4 According to 4-00-notes.vsgml, the latter -K4 means t