Re: ApplicativeDo

2015-02-19 Thread Thomas Bereknyei
I guess it is not broken, just that it has no maintainer. Regardless, is there any traction for an "ado" language extension? The ApplicativeDo proposal advocates for a "do" that automatically downgrades to Applicative, but that may be too much or powerful. Opt-in via &quo

Re: ApplicativeDo

2015-02-18 Thread adam vogt
What part of applicative-quoters is broken for you? 0.1.0.8 compiles on ghc-7.8.4 here, and [ado| a <- Just (); b <- Just 2; (a,b) |] evaluates to Just ((),2) as it should. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://ma

ApplicativeDo

2015-02-18 Thread Thomas Bereknyei
There is a library for TH: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/applicative-quoters-0.1.0.8 (broken at the moment) There is a proposal at: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ApplicativeDo Now with AMP, is this worth revisiting? Why or why not? -Tom