Suppose I compiled some module and kept it's .hi and .o files. Is it possible
to use this module in my program if the source code was deleted for some reason?
Seems like the answer is "yes" — by creating a fake .hs file (with no real
content) and touch-in .hi and .o files I tricked ghc so that i
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:45:41PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> in that case I suggest you run a memory checker, e.g. memtest86, and see
> if it find some hardware bugs. Or run the program on another machine and
> see if the problem appears there as well.
Hey Joachim, thanks for the referenc
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 25.05.2012, 14:26 -0400 schrieb Mark Conway Wirt:
> (I'm starting to think that this issue may not be related to
> Haskell, as the problem arises so inconsistently -- sometimes the
> code runs, sometimes it bombs out early. I haven't rebooted the
> computer in a month or so, ma
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 05:53:52PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> Unless you show us the code, any answers will be guesses in the dark.
> Does your program use unsafePerformIO unsafely perhaps? Or a version
> of a library that happens to have a known bug?
No unsafePerformIO's or IOrefs or the l
Unless you show us the code, any answers will be guesses in the dark. Does
your program use unsafePerformIO unsafely perhaps? Or a version of a library
that happens to have a known bug?
On 25/05/2012, at 14:33, Mark Conway Wirt wrote:
> I have a piece of Haskell code that's been laying aroun
Hi folks.
I have a piece of Haskell code that's been laying around on my computer
for about a year, and I recently decided to dust it off.
The problem is that it used to work fine, but in the interim (in which
I both upgraded OS versions/GHC versions and went from 32 bit to 64 bit)
the code stopp
