Re: Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

2014-05-25 Thread amindfv
You probably want to compile locally, e.g. with Vagrant, and then send the binary into the cloud Tom El May 25, 2014, a las 2:36, harry volderm...@hotmail.com escribió: Simon Marlow-7 wrote Is it just shortage of space, or is there anything else that pushes you towards

Re: Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

2014-05-24 Thread Simon Marlow
On 19/05/2014 13:51, harry wrote: harry wrote I need to build GHC 7.8 so that Template Haskell will work without shared libraries (due to a shortage of space). I understand that this can be done by turning off DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS and associated build options. Is this possibility going to be

Re: Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

2014-05-24 Thread John Lato
On May 24, 2014 11:48 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote: On 19/05/2014 13:51, harry wrote: harry wrote I need to build GHC 7.8 so that Template Haskell will work without shared libraries (due to a shortage of space). I understand that this can be done by turning off

Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

2014-05-19 Thread harry
I need to build GHC 7.8 so that Template Haskell will work without shared libraries (due to a shortage of space). I understand that this can be done by turning off DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS and associated build options. Is this possibility going to be kept going forward, or will it be deprecated once

Re: Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

2014-05-19 Thread harry
harry wrote I need to build GHC 7.8 so that Template Haskell will work without shared libraries (due to a shortage of space). I understand that this can be done by turning off DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS and associated build options. Is this possibility going to be kept going forward, or will it