Re: Hoopl: Combining CheckingFuelMonad with State?

2011-06-27 Thread Justin Bailey
I asked this question on StackOverflow and someone suggested using StateT. Unfortunately I don't think I can really carry around the state I'd like to: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6495320/hoopl-how-can-i-combine-the-checkingfuelmonad-with-a-state-monad On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:56

Hoopl: Combining CheckingFuelMonad with State?

2011-06-24 Thread Justin Bailey
I'd like to carry around some state when rewriting. It seems like CheckingFuelMonad, etc. are set up to use with other monads but I can't get the types to agree. Using MTL I've managed to come up with these types: newtype RewriteOnce a = R (State Bool a) deriving (Monad) instance

Re: Hoopl: Combining CheckingFuelMonad with State?

2011-06-24 Thread Antoine Latter
Hi Justin, this message might be better on the haskell-cafe list (or the excellent beginers list!). When you tried to write the get/put implementations, what problems were you running into? Antoine On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Justin Bailey jgbai...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to carry