Re: How bad is the PowerPC backend?

2009-02-09 Thread Tim Chevalier
On 2/9/09, David Brown wrote: > > Which CPU is the x86? The modern x86 CPUs (such as Core2) will be > significantly faster than the PowerPC, even at comparable clock rates. > Have you just compared even C code tests? > I think that goes a long way towards explaining it... a simple C loop that

Re: How bad is the PowerPC backend?

2009-02-09 Thread Tim Chevalier
On 2/9/09, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Tim, > > > Monday, February 9, 2009, 11:16:22 PM, you wrote: > > > So is the PPC backend really this bad, or should I be looking for > > something weird with the hardware or configuration on the Mac? > > > check GC times too. one possibility is that GC

Re: How bad is the PowerPC backend?

2009-02-09 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Tim, Monday, February 9, 2009, 11:16:22 PM, you wrote: > So is the PPC backend really this bad, or should I be looking for > something weird with the hardware or configuration on the Mac? check GC times too. one possibility is that GC takes much more time due to smaller L2 cache -- Best

How bad is the PowerPC backend?

2009-02-09 Thread Tim Chevalier
Hello, For obscure reasons, I'm running some benchmarks both on an x86 machine (2.20 Ghz, 2 GB of RAM, Linux 2.6.22-15) and on a PowerPC Mac (1 Ghz, 512 MB of RAM, Mac OS 10.5). I noticed that even some pretty simple programs run much slower on the Mac than on the PC. For example, the following pro