Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-10-09 Thread Simon Marlow
On 08/10/2012 12:57, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Montag, den 08.10.2012, 12:08 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow: On 01/10/2012 13:00, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: On 01/10/2012 12:05, Simon Marlow wrote: This probably means that you have packages installed in your ~/.cabal from a 32-bit GHC and yo

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-10-08 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 08.10.2012, 12:08 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow: > On 01/10/2012 13:00, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > > On 01/10/2012 12:05, Simon Marlow wrote: > > > >> This probably means that you have packages installed in your ~/.cabal > >> from a 32-bit GHC and you're using a 64-bit one, or vic

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-10-08 Thread Simon Marlow
On 01/10/2012 13:00, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: On 01/10/2012 12:05, Simon Marlow wrote: This probably means that you have packages installed in your ~/.cabal from a 32-bit GHC and you're using a 64-bit one, or vice-versa. To avoid this problem you can configure cabal to put built packages into

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-10-01 Thread Ganesh Sittampalam
On 01/10/2012 12:05, Simon Marlow wrote: > This probably means that you have packages installed in your ~/.cabal > from a 32-bit GHC and you're using a 64-bit one, or vice-versa. To > avoid this problem you can configure cabal to put built packages into a > directory containing the platform name.

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-10-01 Thread Simon Marlow
On 28/09/2012 00:47, Andrea Vezzosi wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Johan Tibell wrote: The 64-bit version work so I guess that means that a 32-bit GHC/64-bit OS combination only works on OS X? Did you get it working on linux? I'm getting the same error myself: ... ghc-cabal: Bad in

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-09-27 Thread Andrea Vezzosi
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Johan Tibell wrote: > The 64-bit version work so I guess that means that a 32-bit GHC/64-bit > OS combination only works on OS X? Did you get it working on linux? I'm getting the same error myself: ... ghc-cabal: Bad interface file: dist-install/build/GHC/Classe

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-02-28 Thread Simon Marlow
On 23/02/2012 21:24, Johan Tibell wrote: Hi, I tried to install the GHC 7.4.1 32-bit binary tarball today and ran into the error below. Are 32-bit GHC's not supported on 64-bit Linuxes? The error: Installing library in /usr/local/lib/ghc-7.4.1/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0 ghc-cabal: Bad interface file: di

Re: Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-02-23 Thread Johan Tibell
The 64-bit version work so I guess that means that a 32-bit GHC/64-bit OS combination only works on OS X? -- Johan ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Installing binary tarball fails on Linux

2012-02-23 Thread Johan Tibell
Hi, I tried to install the GHC 7.4.1 32-bit binary tarball today and ran into the error below. Are 32-bit GHC's not supported on 64-bit Linuxes? The error: Installing library in /usr/local/lib/ghc-7.4.1/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0 ghc-cabal: Bad interface file: dist-install/build/GHC/Classes.hi magic numbe