On 2 Jun 2005 S. Alexander Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Any reason the libaries don't define:
class HasNull a where null::a-Bool
class HasEmpty a where empty::a
I find that I sometimes switch between using lists, sets, or tables as
my collection type and the forced import
We've been discussing these issues last year on the libraries list,
and we reached the concensus that no concensus could be reached ( :) )
on the ultimate class-based collection framewor (tm). Hence we choose
to go for concrete implementation of Set and Map types. Please refer
to the libraries
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
As Jens Fisseler notes, I have made a confusion about
Set.elems, Set.toList, Set.setToList.
There is even Set.toAscList (although one may argue that should be
Set.toDistinctAscList)
I think the right choice is Set.toList (replacing setToList)
Is Set.elems just a
