Dear GHC-ers,
I'm looking into the inerts of the renamer and I'm trying to get a feel
for where things are bound. I thought it would be useful to have a look
at how the renamer works on something known, so I compiled the following
program (with HEAD):
class Foo x where
type FooTy x y
foo ::
Erratum; Of course, I meant that I had expected the different
occurrences of 'x' to have the same uniques. Similarly, the different
occurrences of 'y'. I did *not* expect 'x' and 'y' to have the same
uniques.
Ph.
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:18 +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
> Dear GHC-ers,
askell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
| Sent: 06 March 2013 10:29
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Need help interpreting renamer trace output
|
| Erratum; Of course, I meant that I had expected the
