Re: Oversized libraries

2010-12-14 Thread Daniel Fischer
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 17:50:30, Simon Marlow wrote: > This particular example seems to be fixed, at least with the current > HEAD: Also with 7.0.1. On my 32-bit system, -O increases the Types.o size from 37K to 45K which is reasonable, while with 6.12.3 it goes from 38K to 543K. __

Re: Oversized libraries

2010-12-14 Thread Simon Marlow
On 14/12/2010 16:33, Audrius Šaikūnas wrote: Hello, I've noticed that libraries that are compiled even with -dynamic are really huge: libHScairo-0.12.0-ghc6.12.1.so - 1.4 M libHSgio-0.12.0-ghc6.12.1.so - 1.6 M libHSgtk-0.12.0-ghc6.12.1.so - 14 M (ldd confirms that these libraries are really lin

Oversized libraries

2010-12-14 Thread Audrius Šaikūnas
Hello, I've noticed that libraries that are compiled even with -dynamic are really huge: libHScairo-0.12.0-ghc6.12.1.so - 1.4 M libHSgio-0.12.0-ghc6.12.1.so - 1.6 M libHSgtk-0.12.0-ghc6.12.1.so - 14 M (ldd confirms that these libraries are really linked dynamically with the rest of the world) ju