On Jan 23, 2014 1:28 AM, "Simon Marlow" wrote:
>
> On 23/01/14 03:52, John Lato wrote:
>
>> However, these are all rather obviously fixable as part of the build
>> system. For me, the worst problems have to do with cleaning. If you're
>> using a Makefile, typically you want to leave intermediate
On 23/01/14 03:52, John Lato wrote:
However, these are all rather obviously fixable as part of the build
system. For me, the worst problems have to do with cleaning. If you're
using a Makefile, typically you want to leave intermediate object files
around and only rebuild them when the sources
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 23:48, John Lato wrote:
>
>> (FYI, I expect I'm the source of the suggestion that ghc -M is broken)
>>
>> First, just to clarify, I don't think ghc -M is obviously broken.
>> Rather, I think it's broken in subtle, unobvious w
On 05/01/2014 23:48, John Lato wrote:
(FYI, I expect I'm the source of the suggestion that ghc -M is broken)
First, just to clarify, I don't think ghc -M is obviously broken.
Rather, I think it's broken in subtle, unobvious ways, such that
trying to develop a make-based project with ghc -M wil
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> John Lato wrote:
>
> > ghc --make doesn't allow building several binaries in one run, however if
> > you use cabal all the separate runs will use a shared build directory, so
> > subsequent builds will be able to take advantage of the in
John Lato wrote:
> ghc --make doesn't allow building several binaries in one run, however if
> you use cabal all the separate runs will use a shared build directory, so
> subsequent builds will be able to take advantage of the intermediate output
> of the first build.
As long as the ghc-options f
(FYI, I expect I'm the source of the suggestion that ghc -M is broken)
First, just to clarify, I don't think ghc -M is obviously broken. Rather,
I think it's broken in subtle, unobvious ways, such that trying to develop
a make-based project with ghc -M will fail at various times in a
non-obvious
Hi,
I have a Haskell project where a number of executables are produced
from mostly the same modules. I'm using a Makefile to enable parallel
builds. I received advice[1] that ghc -M is broken, but that there
is parallel ghc --make in HEAD.
As far as I can tell, ghc --make does not allow building
