Re: Question regarding combinator call convention

2010-02-01 Thread Tyson Whitehead
On February 1, 2010 06:43:40 Simon Marlow wrote: > That's a very old document and is inaccurate in various ways. The > Commentary is more up to date: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts That's good to know. Thanks for the link. : ) Cheers! -Tyson signature.asc Descri

Re: Question regarding combinator call convention

2010-02-01 Thread Simon Marlow
On 29/01/2010 21:02, Tyson Whitehead wrote: I was looking through the code for 6.12.1 and am a bit confused about 11.1.3 in the runtime system documentation docs/rts/rts.tex. That's a very old document and is inaccurate in various ways. The Commentary is more up to date: http://hackage.hask

Question regarding combinator call convention

2010-01-29 Thread Tyson Whitehead
I was looking through the code for 6.12.1 and am a bit confused about 11.1.3 in the runtime system documentation docs/rts/rts.tex. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.79.641&rep=rep1&type=pdf It says the arguments passing convention to a known combinator differs from that o