I see your point. Though, I wouldn't be averse it it printing fixity for
everything. From my point of view, when I do :info on something, I want
as much information as possible.
...speaking of which :), would you consider printing the entire datatype
when :info is done on a constructor? For ins
> Ah...but if the fixity is not explicitly specified (and thus
> defaults to
> infixl 9), this isn't printed, which is what was catching
> me...it seems it
> should be (or perhaps say "infixl 9 (default)")?
But every variable has a fixity, including normal identifiers... should
we report the def
Ah...but if the fixity is not explicitly specified (and thus defaults to
infixl 9), this isn't printed, which is what was catching me...it seems it
should be (or perhaps say "infixl 9 (default)")?
--
Hal Daume III
"Computer science is no more about computers| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
than astrono
> It already does... but a bug meant it wasn't always reporting it.
>
> Now fixed in the head.
... and the bug doesn't exist in 5.04.1.
Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listin
It already does... but a bug meant it wasn't always reporting it.
Now fixed in the head.
SImon
| -Original Message-
| From: Hal Daume III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: 02 December 2002 16:50
| To: GHC Users Mailing List
| Subject: :info in ghci
|
| Any chance :info could also repor
