RE: [Hugs-users] Record puns, time for removal?

2006-10-30 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| There was some discussion on the haskell' list about bring back | record puns, which were once in ghc. | | Record punning would have been very helpful on one of my recent | projects, where I had some large arrays of statically initialized | records. | The

Re: [Hugs-users] Record puns, time for removal?

2006-10-30 Thread John Meacham
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:11:23PM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: I always thought it was a mistake to remove record puns in H98. I would not be against re-introducing them into GHC, since they appear to remain in Hugs and are in Yhc. yes. jhc has them too and I wish ghc did. puns like Foo

Re: [Hugs-users] Record puns, time for removal?

2006-10-30 Thread Seth Kurtzberg
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:30:42 -0800 John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:11:23PM -, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: I always thought it was a mistake to remove record puns in H98. I would not be against re-introducing them into GHC, since they appear to remain in

Re: [Hugs-users] Record puns, time for removal?

2006-10-30 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi puns like Foo { .. } would be great too. I'd vote for enabling them with a command line switch, rather than by default, as they can be confusing to folks learning the language. How discussions come full circle :) I started this discussion on the Hugs users list because I want to