On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:42:13PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Maybe I misunderstood something ... but why do you need to
> > read from the stream multiple times after calling
> > hGetContents? The function returns the _entire_ (lazily
> > evaluated) input stream, there is no need to read again
On 2004-10-25, Peter Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Goerzen writes:
>
> > Now, if [I read with hGetContents h], then the first read
> > I try to make using it works, but subsequent ones don't,
> > since the first one made it half-closed already.
>
> Maybe I misunderstood something ... but
John Goerzen writes:
> Now, if [I read with hGetContents h], then the first read
> I try to make using it works, but subsequent ones don't,
> since the first one made it half-closed already.
Maybe I misunderstood something ... but why do you need to
read from the stream multiple times after ca
On 2004-10-25, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If I tried that with a single Handle opened ReadWrite, then I'd get
>> errors about it being closed whenever I'd try to write out some data.
>>
>> I wasn't able to find any other good way around it.
>
> Hmmm, you should still be able to *wr
On 25 October 2004 14:24, John Goerzen wrote:
> On 2004-10-25, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 22 October 2004 21:58, Peter Simons wrote:
>>
>> On 24 October 2004 23:37, John Goerzen wrote:
>>
>>> * What happens when one Handle corresponding to a socket is closed,
>>> but another
On 2004-10-25, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 October 2004 21:58, Peter Simons wrote:
>
> On 24 October 2004 23:37, John Goerzen wrote:
>
>> * What happens when one Handle corresponding to a socket is closed,
>> but another isn't?
>
> You shouldn't have two Handles on the same so
Simon Marlow writes:
> BTW, I assume you have a good reason for wanting to call
> terminateProcess
Yes, I have to abort the process in case of an exception in
my code. Just giving it EOF is not enough, unfortunately.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to answer, Simon. I really
appreciate it.
P
On 22 October 2004 21:58, Peter Simons wrote:
> I know it's a rather mundane question, but I couldn't find
> an answer to it!
>
> So what does happen when I forget to hClose a Handle? Will
> the garbage collector do that for me? Or not?
Yes, a Handle will be automatically closed sometime after i
On 2004-10-22, Peter Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it's a rather mundane question, but I couldn't find
> an answer to it!
>
> So what does happen when I forget to hClose a Handle? Will
> the garbage collector do that for me? Or not?
I'd like the answer to this question, too, but also:
