RE: BeOS port

2004-10-05 Thread Simon Marlow
On 03 October 2004 02:14, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: Waldemar.Kornewald: Hi, is it possible to use a simpler build system for GHC? :) It isn't so bad. It seems to be quite portable :) We *are* using a simpler build system for GHC. You should have seen the last one :-) Cheers,

Re: BeOS port

2004-10-02 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
Hi, is it possible to use a simpler build system for GHC? :) Could someone please have a look at the build logs? http://zeus.mpg.goe.net/~tuvok/logs Note that I got the same errors when building on Linux! I also ported some .c files. You can find the source here:

Re: BeOS port

2004-10-02 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
Waldemar.Kornewald: Hi, is it possible to use a simpler build system for GHC? :) It isn't so bad. It seems to be quite portable :) Could someone please have a look at the build logs? http://zeus.mpg.goe.net/~tuvok/logs Note that I got the same errors when building on Linux! make[1]: *** No

Re: BeOS port

2004-10-01 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
Waldemar Kornewald wrote: In my Linux build there is a file Arrow.hs, but in my BeOS build this file (and all others) are missing. How are these files generated and why are they not generated in BeOS? Please forget this. Those files exist on both systems, but unfortunately they are not built.

Re: BeOS port

2004-10-01 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: Why do you not offer .hc packages of different builds (FreeBSD and/or Linux)? I could use them as a very good starting point. Or could anyone please create a zip with those files generated from such a build? They aren't portable. You'll need to generate your own