On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:11:13PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
I can’t reproduce this. With the enclosed module and HEAD, I get the
warning; but when I add –fspec-constr-count=5, the warning goes away and
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
I can’t reproduce this. With the enclosed module and HEAD, I get the
warning; but when I add –fspec-constr-count=5, the warning goes away and I
get the specialised rules.
The compiler behaves as expected on
: Bryan O'Sullivan; glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Confusing warnings from GHC HEAD
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.commailto:simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
I can't reproduce this. With the enclosed module and HEAD, I get the warning;
but when I
I can’t reproduce this. With the enclosed module and HEAD, I get the warning;
but when I add –fspec-constr-count=5, the warning goes away and I get the
specialised rules.
Could Cabal not be passing on the flag or something?
Simon
module Foo where
data T = A | B | C | D | E
f :: T - [Bool]
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
I can’t reproduce this. With the enclosed module and HEAD, I get the
warning; but when I add –fspec-constr-count=5, the warning goes away and I
get the specialised rules.
Is this the right fix in general? I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
I can’t reproduce this. With the enclosed module and HEAD, I get the
warning; but when I add –fspec-constr-count=5, the warning goes away and I
get the specialised rules.
Could Cabal not be passing on the
