) project. Andy's work on Non-Stop
Haskell might be a good starting point.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
| Jeremy Shaw
| Sent: 15 November 2007 18:20
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: State of par
Hi
> I am curious, because I have a project in mind that would benefit
> greatly from real-time, parallel garbage collection :)
Is Haskell real-time? Doesn't lazy evaluation rather destroy lots of
the real-time properties that you might like in a language. If you
want a real-time functional langu
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Ravi Nanavati wrote:
It isn't an immediately pressing need a Bluespec, but we do get asked
every once in a while about parallelizing the Bluespec compiler.
Roshan James was working on parallel GC at MSR Cambridge last year.
Unfortunately, it's not an internship-sized
Hello,
Is real-time, parallel garbage collection at all feasible?
My thinking is, real-time garbage collection requires the garbage
collector to be able to work on the problem in small, predictable,
pieces. That seems like something which would also be useful for
scaling up GC to multiple cores?
Ravi Nanavati wrote:
It isn't an immediately pressing need a Bluespec, but we do get asked
every once in a while about parallelizing the Bluespec compiler.
Roshan James was working on parallel GC at MSR Cambridge last year.
Unfortunately, it's not an internship-sized project.
One
of the t
